Showing posts with label Steelers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Steelers. Show all posts
April 17, 2011

A Tale of Two Stadia, featuring Terry Bradshaw


This is the Coliseum in Rome, paid for out of the public treasury, and the site of barbaric and inhuman entertainments which were used in the technique of bread and circuses to keep the population appeased and unlikely to revolt. It was named after the Colossus of Nero, a giant likeness of Nero located nearby.

Gladiators fought and died within the walls, and often the final decision as to the loser's fate was left to the Emperor or some other factotum; people would speculate and wager on the outcome of the contests. Various houses developed their own squads of gladiators, and people declared their allegiance to one team or another.

It was a place of death by gruesome injury, the site of vicious and inhuman entertainments. The injuries and deaths that took place within its walls are a testament to the barbaric and degraded spirit of the population. The most egregious examples of debased morality must be the wealthy families who staged these events for their personal profit, regional amusement, and political demonstrations of power.




This is Heinz Field in Pittsburgh, paid for out of the public treasury, and used to provide public spectacles of conflict between opposing teams of gladiators playing American football, both professional (Steelers) and also semi-pro (University of Pittsburgh). Some political theorists suggest that identification with the Steelers, adoption of their colors, and even wearing mock uniforms distracted the population from the economic realities of the day. The stadium was named after Heinz, a dead Senator's family and a local economic powerhouse located nearby.



Fortunately, Heinz Field exists in our enlightened modernity; the players are protected, injuries are rare, and the athletes personify the highest aspirations of sport.


The Friday LA Times carries the story of one modern gladiator, Terry Bradshaw, whose mind is diminishing and slipping away because of the injuries he sustained while playing valiantly in an earlier version of the Pittsburgh Coliseum.
A series of at least six concussions incurred by Terry Bradshaw while he was the Super Bowl-winning quarterback of the Pittsburgh Steelers are beginning to interfere with his ability to carry out his current duties as a football analyst for Fox Sports, the ex-player said this week in a blog.

Bradshaw said he is suffering from deficits in short-term memory and impairments in his hand-eye coordination. He is being treated at the Amen Clinic in Newport Beach, but experts fear that the best he can hope for is a slowing of the progression of the disorder rather than an improvement in function. ...

Bradshaw wrote that he spent a weekend at the Amen Clinic, where they determined that the problem was the residue of the many concussions he had suffered as a player.



When we think of the Coliseum and the wealthy Roman families who staged their gruesome events for their personal profit, regional amusement, and political demonstrations of family power, we think they must have been corrupt and jaded people of mercenary indifference.

But when we think of the Rooney's, we think "Hey Mr. Rooney is an Ambassador" and we think, "wow the kid really showed Ben that he was displeased at his poor judgement n'at".




In a commercial blog provided by the entertainment company that exploits employs him, Terry Bradshaw describes his injuries and explains that he will do whatever it takes to stay in the booth, just as in earlier days he would do whatever it took to stay in the game.

Bradshaw's announcement of his work injuries difficulties and his courageous continuation of broadcast duties expand the voyeur's spectacle from the stadium floor to the broadcast booth. In addition to watching drugged freaks struggle with injury on the field, passive viewers will be able to mark Terry Bradshaw's deterioration as the season progresses, wondering — is Terry tired today, or is he slipping? Hey, wasn't he always a little bit dumb, anyway?

<a href="http://msn.foxsports.com/video?vid=90c5e758-11e2-4a73-862a-4291921c466e&amp;from=IV2_en-us_foxsports_articles" target="_new" title="Terry talks treatment">Video: Terry talks treatment</a>

You wouldn't wish this on anybody.

Boy we've come a long way.

Here we go Steelers, here we go.



February 06, 2011

Pittsburgh Bicycle du Jour

From Bike Pittsburgh:



"Whenever I see an adult on a bicycle, I no longer despair for the future of the human race."
—H.G. Wells
January 15, 2011

Pittsburgh Math: Common Denominator Steelers, Divided By Roethlisberger



The New York Times, a real newspaper that has actual journalists in addition to their sports writers, casts about for a sports story on the beginning of this gridiron weekend and ends up writing about Pittsburgh's problem: Ben Roethlisberger.

The TITLE tagline at the top of the window reads, "Steelers Unite Pittsburgh - Roethlisberger Splits It".

And still, no enterprising journalist has interviewed or reported on the young coed.
January 09, 2011

End of Season Tally of Trivial Results

This blog has attempted to track Big Ben's contribution to the Steelers' bottom line, in terms of their win/loss ratio, by comparing the team's success without Ben (during the suspension) to the team's success with Ben.

With the regular season over, all the data points are in, and the results are below. Curiously, the Steelers win just as many games with Ben as they do without Ben.

Comparison: Steelers Performance Without and With Ben Roethlisberger
Week 1: AtlantaWINNo Ben3 out of 4
75% WIN
WITHOUT BEN

Week 2: TennesseeWINNo Ben
Week 3: Tampa BayWINNo Ben
Week 4: BaltimoreLOSSNo Ben
 
Week 6: ClevelandWINBen9 out of 12
75% WIN
WITH BEN

Week 7: MiamiWINBen
Week 8: New OrleansLOSSBen
Week 9: CincinnatiWINBen
Week 10: New EnglandLOSSBen
Week 11: OaklandWINBen
Week 12: BuffaloWINBen
Week 13: BaltimoreWINBen
Week 14: CincinnatiWINBen
Week 15: NewYork JetsLOSEBen
Week 16: CarolinaWINBen
Week 17: ClevelandWINBen


The Steelers are a successful team, but Ben's presence plays no measurable role in their results   and the results are trivial, because they measure the result of athletic entertainment, and nothing more.

And in closing, a truly excellent post at Father Duquesne on Michael Vick and Ben Roethlisberger.
December 19, 2010

Pro Football, the Steelers, and Elizabeth Seeburg

The Steelers and their ongoing employment of Big Ben lead me to write about football and culture and the death of Elizabeth Seeburg. (kudos: Infi)

First, let's approach an often-quoted theme regarding football in general and the Steelers and Roethlisberger in particular: the notion is that as long as they're winning, behavior doesn't matter. It's summed up in the saying, "Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing."

The derivative of this misguided philosophy is that off-duty conduct, off-the-field conduct, and in fact anything that doesn't affect "the mission" is an irrelevant distraction. It doesn't matter that the police officer gets arrested for drunk driving or beating his girlfriend. It doesn't matter what the franchise player does in the off-season; what matters is one narrowly defined metric.

This sophistry is wrong in its failure to recognize the scope of the damage, and it's not applicable anyway -- because the Steelers don't win more games with Ben Roethlisberger. This year, they won 75% of their games without Ben, and 70% of their games with Ben. Even this mercenary, utilitarian justification doesn't withstand scrutiny. (see tables below)

It's irrelevant whether the Steelers win; they're a corporate, athletic entertainment franchise. What's relevant to the Steelers is their profits. Look at the Pirates, who have had several successful years making money while losing games because of their staffing business strategy.

What's relevant to us is the benefit/damage to our people, the benefit/damage to our culture, and the economic profit/loss of off-balance-sheet expenses.

Football (as we know it) is unacceptable because:
  • it damages the brains of the professionals and the kids who play it, and
  • our culture develops and tolerates irresponsibility among football players, whether they're professionals or six-year olds

Here's a few indications:
  • Steeler Heath Miller has missed two games because of brain trauma.
  • Football is the sport with the highest rate of youth injuries.
  • "It's obscene," Michael Collins, assistant director of UPMC's Sports Medicine Concussion Program, said of the number of young players seeking treatment for concussions.
  • See the story of Elizabeth Seeburg's recent suicide after reporting her alleged sexual battery by a Notre Dame footballer. (hat tip: Infi)
    • Consider the Oct.2010 death of Declan Sullivan, whose film platform collapsed during a windy ND football practice.
    • Consider the April 2010 death of Notre Dame football recruit Matt James
  • In this week's news, three Idaho football players were charged with sexual crimes; more victims are coming forward.

That's three 2010 student fatalities involving Notre Dame football. There are combat units with better statistics. Nobody's firing the coach; ND only fires coaches for losing.


The Steeler's keeping Roethlisberger was wrong because it perpetuates a culture of thuggish, violent irresponsibility. For all their reputation as a class act, the Rooney family had a chance to make a statement and they went for the money.

The travesty isn't Ben, it's the Rooneys and the Steelers, the parents and the coaches. The trend (and the damage) are bigger than Ben and Art. The blame for the glorification of athletes falls to the people that raised them this way, the grownups with their own agendas (who benefited from their prowess and status) and taught them as children that football players can live by different rules.

And what I really don't get is: people with wives and daughters dress their families in Steelers jerseys. Here we go Steelers, here we go!


A Comparison: Steelers Performance Without and With Ben Roethlisberger

Week 1: AtlantaWINNo Ben3 out of 4
75% WIN
WITHOUT BEN

Week 2: TennesseeWINNo Ben
Week 3: Tampa BayWINNo Ben
Week 4: BaltimoreLOSSNo Ben
 
Week 6: ClevelandWINBen7 out of 10
70% WIN
WITH BEN

Week 7: MiamiWINBen
Week 8: New OrleansLOSSBen
Week 9: CincinnatiWINBen
Week 10: New EnglandLOSSBen
Week 11: OaklandWINBen
Week 12: BuffaloWINBen
Week 13: BaltimoreWINBen
Week 14: CincinnatiWINBen
Week 15: NewYork JetsLOSEBen
Week 16: Carolina---Ben
Week 17: Cleveland---Ben
December 07, 2010

The Ben Roethlisberger Performance Metric: New Data Points


An earlier post described the Steeler's performance before and after the return of prodigal player Ben Roethlisberger and quantified the "Ben Gap", which is the difference in the team's performance with and without Ben.

Generically, you'd think that a team would do much better with the multi-million dollar franchise player than they would without the key player. So far, the Steelers do just as well without Ben as they do with Ben. If I was an Owner, I'd be wondering what I was getting for my annual cost of 12.75 million (even if I did save 1.6M in salary during the four-game sabbatical).


Week 1: AtlantaWINNo Ben75% WIN
WITHOUT BEN


Week 2: TennesseeWINNo Ben
Week 3: Tampa BayWINNo Ben
Week 4: BaltimoreLOSSNo Ben
 
Week 6: ClevelandWINBen75% WIN
WITH BEN

Week 7: MiamiWINBen
Week 8: New OrleansLOSSBen
Week 9: CincinnatiWINBen
Week 10: New EnglandLOSSBen
Week 11: OaklandWINBen
Week 12: BuffaloWINBen
Week 13: BaltimoreWINBen


The table below identifies impending data points.
Week 14: Cincinnati---Ben
Week 15: NewYork Jets---Ben
Week 16: Carolina---Ben
Week 17: Cleveland---Ben


The Ben makes 250% of what Troy Polamalu is paid. Is that justified? If the team does as well without Ben as it does with Ben, is any of his salary justified? Because earlier in the year, when questions were asked, the Rooneys said it was all about winning football games.
November 14, 2010

Steelers Better Without Ben?

I am not a sports fan, but I know how much the Steelers mean to Pittsburghers, and what the generally accepted wisdom is.

Big Ben Roethlisberger. The key player. He's the franchise. The man. Sure he's had some problems, but Pittsburgh needs him. Lucky to have him. Couldn't do without him. Glad he only got four weeks for that icky stuff.

Curiously, when you look at the Steelers' performance (in terms of winning games) this year the Steelers actually did better without Ben than they've done with Ben.

In fact, the Steelers (with Ben) would need to win the next three games straight to match their performance without Ben. The Steelers (with Ben) would need to win the next four games straight to exceed the non-Ben team's performance.

Week 1: AtlantaWINNo Ben75% WIN
WITHOUT BEN
Week 2: TennesseeWINNo Ben
Week 3: Tampa BayWINNo Ben
Week 4: BaltimoreLOSSNo Ben


Week 6: ClevelandWINBen60% WIN
WITH BEN
Week 7: MiamiWINBen
Week 8: New OrleansLOSSBen
Week 9: CincinnatiWINBen
Week 10: New EnglandLOSSBen


Will we appreciate the irony if the Steelers would've been better off firing Ben?

Awaiting further data points.

Week 11: Oakland---Ben???
Week 12: Buffalo---Ben
Week 13: Baltimore---Ben
Week 14: Cincinnati---Ben
Week 15: NewYork Jets---Ben
Week 16: Carolina---Ben
Week 17: Cleveland---Ben
May 05, 2010

What High School Football Players Need -- More Brain Damage

When you look for thought-leaders in Pennsylvania football, when you look for the folks who shape young people before they get to the pro teams, you think about the head coaches at Pitt, Penn State, and Temple. When the Roethlisberger scandal brings public focus to the arrogant thuggery of some athletes, and the tendency for athletes to believe that normal rules don't apply to them, I expected these head coaches to exert their leadership among their youthful charges and set the bar for acceptable behavior. Take the initiative, set a new standard, etc; do the "vision thing".



The Pitt and Penn State head coaches got together Wednesday and made a public call for: football practice in the spring time, so that Pennsylvania kids will be able to keep up with athletes from states that already have spring training for football.

From the Post-Gazette: "Penn State coach Joe Paterno and Pitt coach Dave Wannstedt today met with the executive board of the Pennsylvania State Football Coaches Association (PSFCA) and offered their support for the plan, which has not yet been proposed to the PIAA. Temple coach Al Golden also backs the idea, but he could not attend today's meeting at the Lasch Football Building."

When I think about football players, I think about Steeler "Iron Mike" Webster who suffered from amnesia, dementia, depression, and acute bone and muscle pain. At the end he lived out of his pickup truck or train stations until he died at a young age, a victim of all those hits to his head. He had chronic traumatic encephalopathy, or CTE.

Research indicates that head trauma is a cumulative function. From Wikipedia: It has been speculated that Webster's ailments were due to wear and tear sustained over his playing career; some doctors estimated he had been in the equivalent of "25,000 automobile crashes" in over 25 years of playing football at the high school, college and professional levels.

I recommend Malcolm Gladwell's excellent article, Offensive Play, for an interesting read. In one paragraph discussing the football controversy in 1905 (yes, 1905) a professor at the University of Chicago called it a “boy-killing, man-mutilating, money-making, education-prostituting, gladiatorial sport". The more things change, the more they stay the same.

Gladwell talks about a program at the University of North Carolina called the Sports Concussion Research Program. The SCRP uses a program called HITS to put sensors in the helmets of every UNC football player, and measures every g-force impact the player's brain receives. The HITS data suggest that practice — the routine part of the sport — can be as dangerous as the football games themselves.

A football player’s real issue isn’t simply with repetitive concussive trauma. It is, as the concussion specialist Robert Cantu argues, with repetitive subconcussive trauma. It’s not just the handful of big hits that matter. It’s lots of little hits, too.

That’s why so many of the ex-players who have been given a diagnosis of C.T.E. were linemen: line play lends itself to lots of little hits. The HITS data suggest that, in an average football season, a lineman could get struck in the head a thousand times, which means that a ten-year N.F.L. veteran, when you bring in his college and high-school playing days, could well have been hit in the head eighteen thousand times: that’s thousands of jarring blows that shake the brain from front to back and side to side, stretching and weakening and tearing the connections among nerve cells, and making the brain increasingly vulnerable to long-term damage.


Football leagues now hire mobile scanning units to get baseline scans on young players' heads so that years later, comparisons can be made. Here's a nutty thought: any activity that asks high school kids to pose for "before" pictures to measure subsequent brain damage should be considered child abuse.

When I think about what football players need, two things come to mind:
  1. they need to be taught that they're not demigods above civil society
  2. they need to be protected from the edutainment industry that profits from their smashing their brains against hard objects.
Paterno and Wannstedt might have called for fewer full-contact sessions per year. They could have taken action to improve their student's chances of not ending up like Mike Webster. They should have instituted a zero-tolerance policy for sexual assault or offenses involving drinking.

Instead, they used their positions of responsibility to encourage Pennsylvania high school students to smash their heads more often. Here we go Steelers, here we go...
May 04, 2010

Roethlisberger and the Steelers : from the Family to the Trash

Once Upon A Time, You'd See Pictures Like This:

For a working man's family, that's a lot of money in those jerseys.

Nowadays, You'll See Pictures Like This:


On a somewhat related note, it's interesting what comes up on the second page of search results when you Google "#1 Cochran". Just saying.
April 29, 2010

#1 Cochran, Nike, Big Ben Roethlisberger

#1 Cochran
I was reading an article on the evils of PowerPoint in the NY Times today when I saw a sidebar advertising an article about Ben Roethlisberger. This is how bad The Ben's status is: you can find articles about him while you're not even looking for them.

I recommend you go here to read Timothy Egan's treatise, but let me tease you with a few key paragraphs:


..."Is there anything creepier than a big, beer-breathed celebrity athlete exposing himself in a night club and hitting on underage girls, all the while protected by an entourage of off-duty cops? Well, yes. It’s the big, corporate sponsor — Nike, in this case — that continues trying to sell product with the creep as their role model."


..."If this guy didn’t have a pair of Super Bowl Rings and a $102 million contract to entertain us on Sundays, most people would see him for what he is: a thug with a predatory sense of entitlement."


..."At the company headquarters in Oregon, Nike helps obscure female athletes train and find a community of equally motivated women. That’s one message from Nike. The other is: It’s O.K. for a buffoon of a man to disrespect women, so long as he continues to throw a football well."

#1 Cochran also sponsors Roethlisberger


#1 CochranTo say nothing of #1 Cochran and Big Ben Trucks.com. Pittsburgh's #1 Cochran also sponsors Big Ben.

#1 Cochran

I was pleasantly surprised to see on their website that #1 Cochran has won the Pittsburgh 2010 Business Ethics Award:
#1 Cochran Ethics Award

The award, given to #1 Cochran in the medium-size company category, is presented to honor local companies that demonstrate a firm commitment to ethical business practices.

Kind of funny when you consider the company they keep.
April 27, 2010

Big Ben and Disrespecting the Bing

One of the best examples of symbiosis that I'm aware of is the entertainment industry and American culture. The entertainers start off describing culture, and often end up contributing to and defining it. For instance, from The Soprano's we get the phrase "Disrespecting the Bing".

Without restating the entire oeuvre of pathology, in the TV show a mobster is obligated to apologize for egregious behavior (beating to death a woman pregnant with his child, and leaving the body for others to dispose of) but cannot bring himself to broach the toxic topic. Instead he apologizes for a shallow wisp of an irrelevant slight: he has disrespected the implicit protocol of the bar (The Bada-Bing) that they hang around in. He killed the girl, but he apologizes for "disrespecting the Bing".
Bada Bing Ben Roethlisberger

From Slate's Timothy Noah:
... when you say you disrespected the Bing, you are pleading guilty to the lesser offense. ... Whereas {a} pseudoapology is served up to avoid giving in to an unreasonable demand, the "I disrespected the Bing" gambit is served up to avoid pleading guilty to committing a much larger and very real moral transgression.

If I borrow your car and then total it, I disrespect the Bing if all I say afterwards is that I'm sorry I didn't get it back to you as quickly as I'd promised. If I spray-paint an obscenity on the wall of a public school, I disrespect the Bing if I apologize for misspelling it. And so on.

As you can see, the phrase is much subtler than The Godfather's signature mob phrase, "give him an offer he can't refuse." It is also more nihilistic. It suggests that we live in a world where you can get away with a big wrong if you remember to apologize for all the trivial ones.

Let's look at Ben's statement, from the P-G:
"The commissioner's decision to suspend me speaks clearly that more is expected of me," the statement said. "I am accountable for the consequences of my actions. Though I have committed no crime, I regret that I have fallen short of the values instilled in me by my family. I will not appeal the suspension and will comply with what is asked of me -- and more.

"Missing games will be devastating for me. I am sorry to let down my teammates and the entire Steelers fan base. I am disappointed that I have reached this point and will not put myself in this situation again.

"I appreciate the opportunities that I have been given in my life and will make the necessary improvements."
Let's look, again, at what Ben said he was sorry for:
I am sorry to let down my teammates and the entire Steelers fan base.


Wow. Ben didn't do anything terrible; he just let down the fans. That could happen.

Buried in the eighth paragraph are the tawdry details:
Mr. Roethlisberger, 28, was accused by a 20-year-old college student of sexually assaulting her in the bathroom of a nightclub while he was bar-hopping last month in Milledgeville, Ga. The district attorney there, however, announced he would not press charges because there was not enough evidence to prove that a crime was committed.

Accused "by a 20-year-old college student of sexually assaulting her"
Apologized for "letting down the fan base".
Priceless.
First art imitates life, and then life imitates art.

Also: a respectful shoutout to Infinonymous, who writes one heck of a blog.
April 26, 2010

Big Ben's Blog and #1 Cochran

Some things you just can't make up.

I was wondering, does The Ben have a blog? Turns out he has a few. An early Ben Blog is benroethlisberger.typepad.com/. It looks like a very nice blog.


That early blog explains that he's moved to a more professional site, BIGBEN7.com. Just in case that web server goes awry, the masthead looks like this:



Where does one begin? With the advertising, of course. I saw this image (to the right) on BIGBEN7.com and clicked on it. Boy, I bet those guys at #1 Cochran are real happy about all the "earned media" and extra publicity they're getting out of recent events.

I'm sure that right now, the marketing and the web guy at #1 Cochran are just patting each other on the back and tweeting "who's the man! I've gone viral" to their friends and followers. And look: they've got the #1 Cochran logo in there not once, but twice, and painted red so it stands out.

So I thought to myself, hey there's a URL on that ad, so I clicked on it, and went to BIG BEN TRUCKS.COM, and it's true; you really can't make this stuff up.



Somebody more talented than I am (and they're legion) will be able to effectively Photoshop some people into that blank cutout next to The Ben. There's probably some funny juxtapositions to be had. I'm thinking maybe Terry O'Neill, President of the National Organization for Women, for starters.

Then maybe Mr. Rooney, who conveniently left it to the League to determine the response. He justified his abdication of responsibility by blaming the player's complex union contract. Not a lot of moral cred or leadership there. Not a lot of questions from the media, either.

Who else might be eager to be photoshopped with Ben, who can't appear with him because of scheduling problems? I know: we could put Mr. #1 Cochran in there, I'm sure there's a picture of him on the web.

Feel free to submit other recommendations for Pix With Ben.

I went back to BigBen7.com and clicked the News tab, and I found this image (to the right). Looks like the special edition pickup truck has Ben's signature painted on it! Golly those guys at #1 Cochran are sure lucky. I guess that's why they're #1.

I bet those trucks really hold their value.

What surprised me, is that I would think that #1 Cochran wants to sell vehicles to women. (51% of the market, and all that) Even if trucks are mostly purchased by men (I'm not sure of that), they're probably making a financial decision with their significant other.

Why would #1 Cochran want to be affiliated with Big Ben?

I can't figure out their angle, but they're obviously very smart guys who are experts at what they're doing.
April 25, 2010

Just Business: Big Ben Roethlisberger Women's Jersey

I wonder about trading in celebrity artifacts, speculating that their value will rise because of the notoriety associated with the individual. Case in point: Reebok's official NFL Steeler's women's jersey bearing Ben Roethlisberger's name and number 7.

Is it prudent to buy one and leave it in the packaging, hoping that someday it'll be worth more, this woman-specific product frozen at the time of the celebrity's suspension? Is it ethical? Because it's just business, right?


I'm thinking the time to buy is now, because you won't be able to get these forever.

When I think about the recent tragedy involving the young lady in Georgia, I'm intrigued that the only people I've seen dealing with this issue are men. The Ben, the cop, the bodyguards handlers, the lawyer, the coach, the owner - guys, guys, guys. They could have used a woman in the process. It's rather a breach of precedence that The Ben hasn't had a woman by his side in the press conferences. Won't any of these folks appear with him?

How will the women of Steeler Nation come to bear on this issue? Will they forbid or embrace Steeler Sundays when The Ben is playing? Will women's groups protest at the stadium, or will the black-and-gold minivans close into a circle and defend The Ben?

Are there no Pittsburgh feminists?

How will the women of Steeler Nation treat their men who cheer Ben on? Will they give them a six-week hiatus, with the possibility of a return at four weeks if they're appropriately submissive?

Isn't buying the jersey on speculation just doing (in a micro way) the same thing as what the Steelers are doing - betting now on the future utility value of Ben, hoping that the fast passage of time and the blurry news cycle will make the shame go away? Maybe even someday we'll look back on this and laugh?

Or, in fact, will nothing change? Here we go Steelers, here we go...

April 18, 2010

An Open Letter to Mr. Rooney: Crime and Punishment and the Steelers

Pittsburgh Steelers, Ben Roethlistberger

A law is a rule that society accepts and agrees to be bound by. The basic argument is laid out in Hobbes' Social Contract theory, which holds that people trade constraints on their own action in return for the opportunity to live in a safer, regulated society - a civilized society. When people break the law, it's a crime against both the victim and the civil system.

When USAir cancelled the retirement system for thousands of employee's, was it a crime? Apparently not, since it was done within the laws - in fact, it was facilitated by the laws.

This brings us to the concept of natural law, which posits the existence of a law set by nature and which has validity everywhere. When the authors of the United States Consitution declared "we hold these rights to be self-evident", they were invoking natural law.

Was USAir cancelling the retirement system for thousands of employees a crime in natural law? Yes, I think so. They bargained and agreed to future benefits in exchange for work now, and when the work was done and the cost inconvenient they broke their word in a case of temporal arbitrage. In a more refined era of social clarity, the Board and Management would be shunned and excommunicated from civil society.

We don't often shame people anymore, and we seem to increasingly say "if you're not convicted, you're all right - who am I to judge?", which is a subjugation of morality to legalism.

When a legal crime is committed, our legal system calls for punishment. Why punishment? To stigmatize the undesirable behavior, to demonstrate the dominance of the law, to deter others considering the same behavior, and to restore a modicum of justice to the victim(s), all of which serve to perpetuate the system.

When the crime does not rise to the legal standard but offends natural law, propriety and the social conscience, we should support a social punishment - disapproval, disavowal, condemnation, censure, separation - for all the same reasons. It doesn't have to be a legal crime to be unacceptable.

Sometimes a transgression is forgiven. Forgiveness is a moral action based on moral considerations. Increasingly, forgiveness and even absolution are becoming utilitarian judgments rather than moral judgments. It's a fallacy to conflate moral judgment with utilitarian calculation.

Talking heads tell us that some organizations and people are "too big to fail" (TBTF), or in other words too big to be held responsible for their actions. Bank of America, General Motors, and Fannie Mae were all too big to be left to accountability. When people know they're unlikely to be held accountable, the situation is called "moral hazard", which we've written about before in this space.

steelers roethlisbergerMoral Hazard is the situation in which decisions are disconnected from, and even insulated from, accountability. Moral hazard results in reckless, bad decision making, the costs of which are borne by others.

What do you do when you're the boss, and a key subordinate acts unacceptably - not once, but a few times? What do you do when you're the judge, and a public figure acts unacceptably? Does the importance of the individual matter? Are you less likely to punish a wealthy, important, popular person than an entry-level unknown? Does utility bear on morality?

So, Mr. Rooney, here's a rhetorical question. You're the Bishop. One of your Priests has been outside the limits, more than once. There's been stories but they were all in-house. Now there's been two public events. The individual is a key player. If left in position, the individual may do important business and bring a lot of people to salvation. Priests are hard to come by. Do you:
  • Suspend the Priest for six months, send him to counseling, and then return him to his previous assignment?
  • Fire the Priest, remove them from the organization, and reinforce the moral standards of the brand?
Your answer would be of interest to parents of school children everywhere.

Fortunately, Mr. Rooney, you've got an easier question. You run an entertainment franchise that showcases athletes. The individual is a key player who brings in a lot of people. Do you:
  • Suspend the player for two months and return him to duty?
  • Fire the player, accept the loss of results, and reinforce the standards of the brand?
Does another winning season matter so much?
Is a young woman worth a Super Bowl? How many would be too many?
How would you treat it if he were the janitor? Or a wide receiver?

Your answer will be of interest to parents of 20-year old girls, and to parents of 14-year old football players, everywhere.
July 15, 2009

Black and Gold Pittsburgh Insanity


July 15, 2009. Former Steelers Franco Harris, left, and Rocky Bleier, right, present a Steelers jersey to Ken Nacke, brother of Flight 93 passenger Louis Nacke II, during a press conference today announcing a "9/11 We Will Never Forget" dinner Sept. 11 at Heinz Field, raising money for the Flight 93 National Memorial.

I'm probably looking at this the wrong way, but two three words come to mind: Garish. Disrespectful. Hunky. And I'm flirting with two more words: Media whores.

When I say disrespectful, I mean disrespectful of the honored dead, not disrespectful of the commercial Black-And-Gold.

Losing a brother in a terrorist hijacking? Tragic. Unforgettable. Traumatic.
Putting his name on a Steelers jersey? Priceless. Tasteless.

And I like Rocky Bleier's photo on the podium. I'm expecting him to announce his candidacy for Something pretty soon.

"I have come to feel an affinity with United Flight 93," Bleier said. "The proximity of its resting place in Shanksville puts me in constant reach of that eventful day. The story of how a group of passengers and crew overcame those hijackers continually gives me hope."

Look at the red-white-blue poster on the podium (image from the Tribune Review):


I read a book once (really) by a graphic designer. He said that if you really want to know the intended message of a poster, walk twenty feet back from it and squint your eyes. When you do that, the predominant visual theme stands out. When you do that with this poster, it looks mostly like a Rocky Bleier for Something advertisement - I see the swooping curve leading the eye to Rocky's magnificent head, and his name below it. It runs right-to-left, which is counterintuitive in the West, buy what do I know? Maybe they're going for subtlety. They missed.

This press conference is a commercial selling Rocky Bleier Inc. Franco Harris (whose son Dok is running for Mayor and has a political future before him) discusses "us all knowing about" Rocky's VietNam service, Rocky is a guy who brings things together, Rocky's first thought is how to benefit others.

I'm probably just being cranky, but this just smells all wrong.

Read more: http://www.postgazette.com/pg/09195/983759-66.stm#ixzz0LMyXSrJj
And more: http://www.postgazette.com/#ixzz0LMw4zmOT

I'm probably looking at this the wrong way.
June 17, 2009

2009 Trifecta Steelers Penguins Pirates

I am not good at talking sports. Fortunately, I have found the Wiki category for
sports terminology, and I've looked up three-peat and hat trick, etc. I think I'm on steady ground when I make this suggestion.

Three-Peat Triple Crown Hat-Trick

Hah! Starbucks with their non-fat triple-venti half-caff light carmel drizzle terminology has got nothing on me.

Pittsburgh 2009 : Primed for the Clean Sweep


Look at 2009 in Pittsburgh Sports so far:
     Steelers win Superbowl
     Penguins win Stanley Cup
     Pirates win World Series

You know what MeatLoaf says: Two out of three ain't bad.
But imagine if you will, if Pittsburgh won all three.


It's quite possible. We haven't even crossed the All-Star break yet.

Let's work the numbers, just like the elderly tycoon and the ingenue. We know the outcome is possible, we just need to determine the price.

Could the Pirates win the World Series if we gave them $100 million? Absolutely.
Could the Pirates win the World Series if they found $50 million? Definitely.
Could the Pirates win the World Series if they were given $30 million? Yes.
Could the Pirates win the World Series with $25 million? Probably
Could the Pirates win the World Series if they were given $20 million? Maybe not.
How about if they found $5 million? No way.

My point is, there's a cash value at which the Pirates could buy the World Series. (I learned this from the NY Yankees.) I'd like to hear from some baseball fans just what they think that number would be. We don't need a powerhouse for the next three years - we just want to rent some talent for 120 days. How much would it cost?

According to Forbes' List of the 400 Richest Americans, these local folks would certainly be among those invited to participate:
  • Richard Scaife would consider kicking in
  • His sister, Cordelia Scaife is probably good for a check
  • Teresa Heinz could certainly advance some cash.
  • Richard Simmons, chairman of Allegheny Teledyne, should be invited.
  • Art Rooney would put some skin in the game.
  • Joe Hardy has always been community minded.
  • Joe's daughter, Margaret Hardy Magerko, CEO of 84 Lumber, should be good for a share.
  • Henry Hillman would not want to be left out.
  • Paul Mellon's brood must be good for a piece of the action.
  • Stanley Druckenmiller, former PNC analyst, now runs a fund for George Soros.
There's ten individuals. $3 Million each, 30 million.

Hey - there's more to fund raising in the Burgh. Let's approach UPMC and Highmark. If they agree to donate $10M each, we'll promise not to ask them for something in the future. It'll be like Another Pittsburgh Promise. Now we've got $50 million.

Naming Rights Do they want it to be the Giant Eagle World Series, or the Shop N'Save World Series? We're not playing favorites, we'd just like one of them to be recognized. I'm just saying.

Simultaneous wins in Football, Hockey, and Baseball - it's never been done.
If not now, then when.
If not by us, then whom?          (my respects to Rabbi Hillel the Elder)
June 13, 2009

Good news for Pittsburgh, jobs well done



I am not a positive person (IANAPP) but and yet, even to me, there's just a lot of good Burgh news this last week or so.

Influential Visitors


This is more than tourism, schmourism. National and international visitors, influential visitors, national media coverage. Talking heads and blogs with Pittsburgh in the background.

One part of this is we're a Democratic machine city and the Democrats are back in power. The larger part of this is that Somebody Somewhere is doing a good job. This didn't happen spontaneously. (ps: Nullspace attributes both to former Mayor Tom Murphy.)

Good news at the Airport


We end up with the same coverage, from a more diverse group of airlines, and reduced reliance on the used-to-be USAirways. Somebody out at the airport is doing a good job, too.

Pittsburgh's Newspaper Gets It

The Penguins won the Stanley Cup. The PostGazette website deploys a box where people can sign up for SMS text messages. This is a great thing, it shows they're getting beyond the internet as a thing-in-itself and moving to sell their key competency (breaking local news) to their audience (Pittsburghers and the Diaspora) through new media. If they survive, it's going to be because they have a value-add relationship with the audience. They saw a potential opportunity, prepared for it, and executed well. Somebody at the Post Gazette is doing a good job, and somebody on the management team is letting them do it. This is a welcome indication that the P-G gets it.

The Pittsburgh Penguins won the Stanley Cup

Readers will know that I'm not an avid, knee-jerk sports fan.
  • The Pittsburgh Penguins won the Stanley Cup. I am not a hockey fan (IANAHF), but to me it looked like the Penguins won with skill and strategy, and beat a thug team. (I am open to correction.) (Click here for photos of the 2009 Stanley Cup Pool Party)
  • It's a good thing when the world hears The Pittsburgh Steelers won the Super Bowl, and this week they got rings designed to emphasize their six Super Bowl victories. What's that? Nobody else has six Super Bowl victories?


Corporate Headquarters

  • Westinghouse opened their new corporate headquarters in Cranberry. Although it has a Cranberry zip code, this is a great thing for (Greater) Pittsburgh. It's also going to be a great thing for the Zelionople Airport, recently renamed the Pittsburgh Jet Center (once 8G7, now PJC). Zelie has been improving that airport for a decade. It's going to be a good thing for LaRoche, Pitt, and CMU. (The move is zero-sum in that Westinghouse is leaving its Monroeville digs - but it was going to go somewhere, and it stayed in the Burgh.)
  • Dick's Sporting Goods is mid-phase on their new corporate headquarters on the periphery of the Pittsburgh Airport (PIT). They're going to have a taxiway from the runway to the hangar, so executives can fly in, land and taxi to the hangar, and walk into the corporate campus without ever going outside. Dick's people will be getting their Master's at RMU.
  • Dick's location is driven by all the same good factors that have put Bayer's headquarters where it is. Sometime, drive through the parking lots at Robert Morris University, and observe all the Bayer vehicle stickers. Then, get yourself some Burgh cuisine at Egg's N'At, right down the street.
These are all demonstrations for the model of how other corporate campuses are going to exist - they're going to be outside of the city proper, close to upscale housing (that's reasonably priced by national standards), close to an airport, and close enough to Downtown that their people can get into the Purple Belt and the Cultural District. Somebody is going a good job of delivering regional results in spite of our parochial, Balkanized area.

Takeaway lesson: Corporate headquarters don't move to cities - they move to Regions with the right co-location of Transportation, Housing, Education, and Culture. We do well on T,H,E, and C; Pittsburgh is not good at the Regional perspective. If we want to thrive in the real economy, and not in Grandpa's used-to-be world, we need to do better at Regional.

Takeaway Factoid: In 2009, 8 of the Fortune 500 Companies have corporate headquarters in Pittsburgh. From Wikipedia: Pittsburgh is also home to Bayer USA and the operations center of Alcoa. Other major employers include BoNY Mellon, GlaxoSmithKline and Lanxess. The Pittsburgh region serve as the Northeast U.S. regional headquarters for Nova Chemicals, Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, FedEx Ground, Ariba, Rand, and National City. Major non=-public companies headquartered in Pittsburgh include Guru.com, 84 Lumber, Giant Eagle, Highmark, Rue 21, and GENCO Supply Chain Solutions. Other major companies headquartered in Pittsburgh include General Nutrition Center (GNC) and CNX Gas (CXG), a subsidiary of Consol Energy.



Here's something I resisted believing for a long time, and finally realized it was true: you're either growing or you're dying; there is no status quo. I think that's true in life, in business, in economics, and for regions. It's good to see good news

The puzzle is going to be, how to maintain the core city that is essential to the Region, when all the investment happens outside the city?

The city's undescribed asset is its "spikiness", it's tendency to create vigorous cross-domain pockets of creativity that generate high-value innovation (per Richard Florida).

What are the other options? Do we just give the city to Pitt and UPMC? Do we bulldoze lost neighborhoods and return them to nature?

I think we need to generate a regional financial structure in order to make the decision to relocate to Pittsburgh a no-brainer for more companies.


All these good news items are the results of long efforts, well done. These are the sorts of results that have high time latency; that is, there's a long time delay between the effort and the results - there's no immediate feedback. These are all welcome news items; my compliments to the people behind the scenes that helped bring them about. Nicely done.

This is a follow-up of sorts to my previous post, The Best City In the World.