Showing posts with label Jordan Miles. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jordan Miles. Show all posts
February 04, 2012

I'll take "Curiouser and Curiouser" for 75K, please



According to the Post-Gazette, legislation will be introduced at City Council on Tuesday authorizing payment of $75,000 to Jordan Miles in a partial settlement of his federal lawsuit about Pittsburgh police brutality.

The partial settlement would dismiss the city and its officials from the suit, but leave intact the litigation against the three officers Mr. Miles accuses of beating him on a Homewood street in January 2010.

The city had previously offered $180K as a complete settlement, which Mr. Jordan rejected. That offer was generally understood as a legal technique to deny Mr. Jordan's legal fees if any final award comes in at less than $180K; it was, in fact, a technique challenging his legal representation.

This legislation before Council could be very interesting. Nobody wants to have their name attached to the settlement offer, nobody will admit to wrong-doing; it's a "jeopardy calculation". A few points:
  • The settlement will remove Mayor Luke Ravenstahl from accountability
  • There's no indication the settlement is acceptable to Jordan Miles

The City is willing to pay $75K to change the narrative to say: Stuff happens. It's not Luke Ravenstahl's fault; it's not the City's fault; it's not a systemic fault. Maybe those three individual policemen did something wrong, but not the City, not the Police Department, not their Training, and definitely not the City's policy regarding "99 cars" a/k/a "jump cars". It's not like there's any recent history.

It would be fascinating if Council disapproves the settlement because they'd like to see the City have a moment of truth in Court - the whole "justice be done" thing.

Personally, I hope Jordan Miles' legal team gives the City a beating just like the City gave to Jordan Miles, because until that happens the politicians accountable for the police department will continue to view the FOP as a voting block and nothing will change.

JusticeForJordanMiles
justice4jordan
January 12, 2012

Losing Faith: 1960's Alabama and Relative Perniciousness

Relativity is tricky, in both physics and ethics. Sometimes it's pretty clear that two things are both "bad", but it's hard to say which is worse, to quantify or evaluate relative perniciousness.

In a recent incident, an Allegheny County police officer says he stopped at a congested intersection. There were two Township policemen and a Township Councilman. The County Cop says that when he asked them about the intersection, one Township cop punched the County cop in the throat and knocked him down, then the two Township cops filed affadavits and charged the County cop with criminal charges. The charges were without merit and were dismissed. The County cop is now suing.

Here's a question: Which was worse:
  1. the Township cop assaulting the County cop, or
  2. the two Township cops filing false statements, charging a crime that didn't exist, and attempting to put the County cop in jail?
The assault is a one-time violent wrong, which if survived will diminish over time; the perjury, conspiracy, and false imprisonment will have life-long effects if successful.

Here's an observation: the perjury, conspiracy, and false imprisonment of the County Cop didn't succeed, but the "justice system" did not follow through; there was no accountability for the two Township cops - who, if the County cop is right, committed crimes of their own. The criminal justice system did not deal with the false reports and fake charges; the victim had to resort to a civil lawsuit to try to right the wrong. And this is a policeman.




I believe in our system and our society. More to the point, I want to believe in our system and our society. (Because in the end, it's all about me.) And so I think, ok that's just one event. Aberrations happen. It's the exception that shows how good things are, most of the time. I want to believe that. All my inclinations make me want to believe.

Increasingly, I'm having trouble believing that there's just one problem every few years.




For instance, from the Post-Gazette's Sadie Gurman, Nov 13 2010:
The Allegheny County district attorney's office said it will review dozens of criminal cases involving a pair of Pittsburgh police officers charged Friday with framing two men in what prosecutors called a wrongful drug arrest.

Officers Kenneth Simon, 49, and Anthony Scarpine, 58, were put on paid leave and could face termination in light of the charges against them, which include conspiracy, official oppression, unsworn falsification and obstruction. Officer Simon also was charged with felony perjury and is accused of stealing more than $800 from the pockets of one of the men he and Officer Scarpine arrested.

The charges were the result of a months-long probe by the district attorney's office into the July 7 arrests of Tim Joyce, 22, and David Carpenter, 38, at a North Side car wash. Numerous drug offenses against the men were filed -- and later withdrawn -- after the officers wrote in sworn accounts that they witnessed a hand-to-hand cocaine transaction that the district attorney's office said did not take place.

Surveillance footage from the car wash, in the 2900 block of Stayton Street, "does not depict any contact whatsoever" between either suspect and shows Officer Simon taking a wad of what appeared to be cash from Mr. Joyce's pocket
, prosecutors wrote in a criminal complaint.
Charges against the police officers were dismissed.




Sure, maybe there's more than one bad cop out there; it's not all of them, just some. And I'd like to think that the rest of the criminal justice system protects us from those few bad apples. Because the really bad stuff, that all happened in Alabama in the 1960's. Not in these modern times, not in Pennsylvania. Couldn't happen here/now.




From Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, we have this:
The "Kids for cash" scandal unfolded in 2008 over judicial kickbacks at the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania. Two judges, President Judge Mark Ciavarella and Senior Judge Michael Conahan, were accused of accepting money from Robert Mericle builder of two private, for-profit juvenile facilities, in return for contracting with the facilities and imposing harsh sentences on juveniles brought before their courts in order to ensure that the detention centers would be utilized.

Two interesting sidebars to mention:
  • Is this what happens when you privatize government functions (such as prison) - maybe when you run government like a business, justice goes away and you get business-like results?
  • None of this is trivial when one of the possible outcomes of our criminal justice system is execution.

How did these Luzerne County kids end up? How did the false imprisonment change them, their view of society, their view of justice? As a parent, what do you do when the Cops, the Judge, and the Prosecutor falsely imprison your child, and your kid gets raped in jail, joins a gang, and comes out a different person? Does anybody believe that expunging their criminal record makes them whole?




Which brings me, inexorably, to Jordan Miles. Jordan Miles (the violin-playing honor student at the magnet school) was beaten, tased, and had the hair ripped out of his scalp by three Pittsburgh policemen. The policemen submitted affadavits and charged Jordan Miles with crimes.

Fortunately, Jordan Miles had family and a clean record. If he'd had a marijuanna bust a few years prior and if English wasn't the primary language in his house, it all would have gone differently. But his family supported him, his community supported him, and the charges were dropped.

The more I think about it, the beating and scalping weren't the worst things those cops did to Jordan Miles; the attempt to falsely imprison him looms much larger. And if he didn't have a clean record and family support, it would have happened.

The more pernicious crime may be the filing of false statements, the conspiracy of the official report, and the attempt to deprive Jordan Miles of his liberty, to label an innocent man a criminal, and to (in fact) make him into a different person by sending him to prison for a few years.





I want to believe in our system, I really do. But when I look at the conspiracy to falsely imprison Jordan Miles; when I look at the fabrication of a story about Tim Joyce and David Carpenter, and again with Officer Ray Hrabos; when I look at the police escorting Big Ben in Georgia; and when I look at Luzerne County, I think: don't be naive, don't be a sucker.

And in each of these cases, the criminal justice system didn't self-correct; Ray Hrabos and Jordan Miles are seeking justice in civil court.

And when these incidents are left unchallenged, when the wrongs are not made right, our entire system is degraded and the people lose faith. And so the damage done by these perjuries, conspiracies, and false imprisonment accrues to both the instant victim and to our society at large. This hurts everybody.



And finally, I need to say: this is not most police, who are good, caring people. I would go further and acknowledge that most of those good police are prisoners of the system too. I understand why Alexis Madrigal expresses empathy for John Pike of UC-Davis. Peter Moskos attributes a lot of this to flawed training and places the blame on police departments, not police officers. James Baldwin recognized that notorious Alabama Sheriff Jim Clark was merely the endpoint of a system that shaped the sheriff just as it shaped the people the sheriff attacked.

The understanding that most police are not the problem does not mitigate the issue; as Allegheny County police officer Ray Hrabos said about his experience, "Wrong is wrong, and this needs to be righted".

Every complaint needs to offer a recommendation or else it's just whining; the recommendation is, We need to treat false reports and false charges (not wrong charges) as pernicious crimes against both the individual and society.


JusticeForJordanMiles
justice4jordan
January 11, 2012

Veracity of the Official Police Version and Public Confidence in Justice

From the always excellent Rich Lord in the Post-Gazette:
A 2010 incident that pitted police against police is now the subject of a lawsuit in which an Allegheny County officer said that Springdale Borough officers roughed him up, baselessly charged him and lied about it all.

The complaint, filed today in U.S. District Court by county Officer Ray Hrabos, said that Springdale Officer Mark Thom pulled a gun on him and pushed him into a snow bank during a brief dispute over a blocked street. Another Springdale officer later filed charges against Officer Hrabos, most of which were dismissed at the district judge level. The last charge -- disorderly conduct -- was thrown out and mocked by a judge on appeal.

"If this can happen to Officer Hrabos, then who among us is safe from police officers who are willing to lie?" asked attorney Timothy P. O'Brien, who is representing the officer. "Any citizen can be in the same context as Officer Hrabos, where two or three police officers or public officials can fabricate charges if they're willing to state something that wasn't true."

Allegheny County Common Pleas Judge Robert Gallo dismissed the disorderly conduct charge on appeal, telling both sides the matter "should have been settled that night. ... This is insane to come down here on this case. Just insane to even bring it here, this far."

Officer Hrabos said he was not worried about being ostracized for suing other officers. "Wrong is wrong, and this needs to be righted," he said.


The Jordan Miles case is about the same thing: integrity of the official version, a citizen's rights, and the (public servant vs military) police orientation.

Increasingly, people are being mistreated by police in the same shameful way that blacks have been mistreated for a long time. Now they're even treating cops like they mistreat black people. I've said it before; in today's environment, increasingly we are all black Palestinians, and maybe we're going to discover what all that noise was about.
January 09, 2012

Second Anniversary of Jordan Miles' Beating by Pittsburgh Police



Two years ago this week, at 11pm on Jan 11 2010, there was an event involving three Pittsburgh policemen and one young man.

The three police officers were in a "99 car", which is a special sort of squad. Between them, these three officers accounted for 20% of Pittsburgh's illegal firearms arrests (no data available on convictions) in the previous year.

More recently, on Christmas Eve it was also an unmarked "99 Car" with plainclothes police that shot and killed a 24-year old black man who was trying to get away from them.

There is no independent truth from two years ago, no video tape or disinterested eyewitnesses, but it seems like everybody's version involves these common elements:
  • The plain-clothes cops saw Jordan Miles and got out of their unmarked car.
  • Jordan Miles ran away.
  • They chased him, tased him, and beat him.
  • They stuck a tree branch through his cheek, and ripped the hair out of a portion of his head.
While Jordan Miles was in the hospital (pictures here), the police submitted paperwork describing Jordan's behavior and charged him with crimes: loitering and prowling after dark, resisting arrest, escape, and aggravated assault (of the three policemen). The judge dismissed all the charges against Jordan.

The three cops spent a year off duty, drawing full pay and benefits, and even drawing the overtime money etc. they would have earned if they hadn't taken a year off with pay.

Local government decided not to investigate the event because the Feds were going to look at it. The Feds decided there was insufficient evidence to make a conviction of the police officers likely.

The City Of Pittsburgh has paid a retired cop to report that (acccording to the policemen's official version of events) the police acted consistently with their training. The consultant did not say that the official version was true, or that what the policemen did was either legal, moral, or justifiable. Pittsburgh Courier contributor Louis 'Hop' Kendrick writes that Pittsburgh paid Jesse James to investigate Frank James.

The police say that Jordan Miles had a Mountain Dew they thought was a gun. There is no Mountain Dew can/bottle in the evidence. The city's consultant explains that absence as an excusable, understandable failure to secure evidence.

A year ago, on the first anniversary of the beating, the Post-Gazette said,
A year after what looks like the unnecessarily harsh treatment of a law-abiding citizen, there is no sign of movement toward a just conclusion.

Pittsburghers have a right to know what happened to Jordan Miles. He and the officers have a right to see the facts aired in public. Until that day, a cloud will hang over Pittsburgh and what passes for justice, accountability and transparency in this city.




Until this is resoved, the Beating of Jordan Miles will continue to reflect poorly on the city of Pittsburgh and on the great majority of the police force who had nothing to do with it.
December 26, 2011

Correct Expectations, Kick the Can, Accountability re Jordan Miles



Sometimes, evaluating an experience depends on your expectations. If your expectations are informed and realistic, you are more likely to end up with the appropriate degree of satisfaction.

Before you go downtown — for dinner, a play, a meeting, business, etc — make sure you have the correct expectations.

From the excellent Rick Lord in today's Post Gazette::
The City of Pittsburgh paid a consultant, Joseph J Stine, to write a report which "concludes that jumping out of an unmarked car, pursuing Mr. Miles and striking him until he submitted to being handcuffed were consistent with police training."
If that's not your expectation when you go into the city, perhaps you should recalibrate. Also, a minor nit: testifying for cash that something is "consistent with training" is not the same as saying it's legal, justified, or moral. The Police Academy lesson plan doesn't trump the Constitution.

Playing Kick the Can


The report is not a whitewash; it does find one instance of incorrect procedure. When the policemen threw away the Mountain Dew can that they thought was a gun, they violated evidence rules. The report explains that this error is understandable in the context.

Jordan Miles insists there was no Mountain Dew. The report asserts without evidence that there was one.

The Mountain Dew is the purported basis for the police beating. No Dew, no justification.
If there ain't no Can,
Why did you Beat the Man?

If there ain't no Dew,
WTF is wrong with You?





Hired guns deliver the desired outputs. According to AELE, Mr. Stine's rates are:
  • $275 per hour for review of material and report preparation and submission
  • $100 per hour for travel
  • $2,000.00 per day depositon [sic]
  • $2,500.00 per day for trial testimony days
  • $1,200.00 per day for monitoring testimony
  • All plus expenses


Traditionally, a litigant gives a consultant money to get the desired report which is biased in favor of their case. What's curious in this instance is that the litigant (the City of Pittsburgh and the Mayor of Pittsburgh) are public and elected, respectively, and so they are presumably accountable for their decisions and the way they spend the Public Treasure.
  • It would be interesting to hear the Mayor support (or disavow) the expert report He paid for.
  • It would be interesting to hear who decided to hire this consultant, and what process guides public spending on this sort of thing.
  • It would be interesting to know, what public official supports the expense and the report that the City has introduced to the Court as authoritative and reliable?




The intriguing question is whether the City, the Pittsburgh Police, and the CopOnTheBeat actually believe this report (which they have told the Court is truthful). I kind of hope that they don't believe it, either.

@justice4jordan
May 27, 2011

500 Days of Delayed Justice



It's been 500 Days since Jordan Miles was attacked and beaten by three Pittsburgh Police officers. 500 days is a very long time.

It's interesting that the Sixth Amendment to the US Constitution guarantees the defendant's right to a speedy trial, but doesn't guarantee the victim any right to a speedy trial of the accused.

Everything gets verklempt when the police are the defendants.
May 23, 2011

Jordan Miles Interview and the Calculus of Justice in Pittsburgh


Bonus Assignments:
     1. Interpret the non-verbals in these two photos.
     2. Which people would you rather share a meal with? Explain.


April 10, 2011

Why President Obama should attend the CAPA Graduation: Jordan Miles

Various reports suggest that President Obama may participate in the graduation exercises at the Pittsburgh School for the Creative and Performing Arts (aka CAPA 6-12), which is one of six finalists in the Race to the Top High School Commencement Challenge.

The other finalists are Bridgeport High School in Bridgeport, Wash.; Wayne Early Middle College High School in Goldsboro, N.C.; Booker T. Washington High School in Memphis, Tenn.; Science Park High School in Newark, N.J.; and High Tech High International in San Diego.

There are probably great reasons for President Obama to visit any of these schools, which are all fine examples of best-in-class education programs. There's one great reason for President Obama to attend the CAPA ceremony: he can have CAPA alumni Jordan Miles and his mother, Terez Miles, sitting with him.

 


Jordan Miles is the CAPA student who was attacked, assaulted, and beaten without cause by three Pittsburgh police officers. The picture on the above-left is "before" the beating; the picture on the above-right is "after" they pulled the hair out of his head. Jordan Miles has passed polygraph tests confirming his report. There has been no action taken on the three police officers who beat him, other than putting them on fully paid administrative leave - in other words, a no-show, paid vacation including overtime, etc.

Imagine the moment when the President of the United States says to the audience, "You think I'm important? I think Jordan Miles is important."

That's a moment worth the President's time, and that's why President Obama should attend the CAPA graduation ceremony.

January 30, 2011

"Do Not Cross" Pittsburgh FOP

"Cop Drama" is an excellent article in the City Paper by Chris Young, about an ongoing show situated in Pittsburgh. Unfortunately, it is not a television series that the Pittsburgh Film Office can take credit for; it is a case of real life imitating bad art. But if this were a series, the key points of this week's show would include:
  • Outcry over the beating of Jordan Miles has been overshadowed, if not replaced, by the hue-and-cry over a spoof press release on the first anniversary of the beating
  • "If we catch anyone with regard to this, it's going to be multiple felonies," FOP President Dan O'Hara was quoted as saying in the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. I don't think the FOP, which is an employee union, is entitled to conduct investigations, seize evidence, or file felony charges.
  • According to an affidavit of probable cause -- a sworn statement needed to justify the Dreaming Ant search warrant -- police were forwarded a copy of the statement by WTAE-TV reporter Ashlie Hardway.
  • The role of WTAE and Ashlie Hardway in sending the police squad to Crazy Mocha / Dreaming Ant to seize their hard drive and router has not yet been fully explored.
  • Pittsburgh ACLU says the press release "is parody protected by the First Amendment"
  • "It's a part of democratic free speech," says Pittsburgh City Councilor Bill Peduto
  • a neologism was introduced: "douchenarchists"

Kudos to City Paper, Chris Young, Chris Potter, and Sadie Gurman, the only Pittsburgh journalists who seem to be working this beat.


Although the Post-Gazette reporting staff seems too interested in Steelers pep-rallies to cover the story, the PG Editorial Board awoke, arose on their hind legs, and wrote an interesting piece on Friday:
A year after what looks like the unnecessarily harsh treatment of a law-abiding citizen, there is no sign of movement toward a just conclusion.

Pittsburghers have a right to know what happened to Jordan Miles. He and the officers have a right to see the facts aired in public. Until that day, a cloud will hang over Pittsburgh and what passes for justice, accountability and transparency in this city.


Finally, in the top-left corner of this blog, you will find a Justice Delay Counter which keeps track of the number of days since Jordan Miles was beaten without any accountability. At press time, 383 days and waiting.
January 22, 2011

The Crime of Delay


After initial press reports of the beating of Jordan Miles, the wheels of the process began to turn ever so slowly.

On January 27 2010,
Black leaders today called for prosecutors to drop criminal charges against a Homewood teenager who says three white police officers beat him during an arrest earlier this month.

During a news conference this morning, leaders of the Pittsburgh branch of the NAACP called for the city to fire the officers because they beat Jordan Miles, who is black, "beyond recognition."

M. Gayle Moss, president of the local chapter, said the officers should face criminal charges for the Jan. 12 incident outside the home of Miles, 18, an honors student at the Creative and Performing Arts high school, Downtown.


On March 6 2010, charges against Jordan Miles were dismissed. Among the findings:
  • All three officers are 5 feet 11 inches or taller and weigh about 200 pounds. Mr. Miles is 5 feet 6-1/2 inches tall and weighs 150 pounds.
  • Police say they thought Jordan Miles had a gun, but it turned out to be Mountain Dew. The Dew evidence was lost. Mr. Miles said the Mt.Dew never existed.
  • Police testified that a woman claimed to not know Mr. Miles, but she contradicted their testimony.
  • Jordan Miles said, "I go to a very prestigious school. I get good grades, I don't want anyone to have an impression of me that I'm some gang-banger just because of the neighborhood that I live in."


On March 13, 2010 members of the Pittsburgh Fraternal Order of Police (FOP, the police union) don green shirts to march in today's St. Patrick's Day Parade to publicly declare their support for three officers accused of beating a Homewood teen.
In a memo dated Friday, the Fraternal Order of Police Fort Pitt Lodge No. 1 encouraged members to turn out in "unprecedented" numbers during the parade and to purchase T-shirts for $12 stating "We Support Our Three Brothers."

On the front of the shirts are the numbers 3599, police code that represents the three officers' car number the night of the controversial arrest.

The back of the shirt has the words of support and a thin blue line -- a reference to the 1988 documentary film, "The Thin Blue Line," about a man sentenced to die for the murder of a Dallas police officer he did not commit. The film's title came from the prosecutor's comment that police are the "thin blue line" separating society from anarchy.


On March 19, the FBI and a federal grand jury appeared on the scene:
The FBI this week took a DNA sample from Jordan Miles to compare to hair and braids found on a Homewood sidewalk as part of an investigation into his allegations that three Pittsburgh police officers beat him, the teenager's mother said Thursday.

"I know the FBI is looking for all kinds of evidence, including physical evidence, because the only piece of evidence which was logged into the police evidence room was the spent cartridge from the Taser," said Miles' attorney, J. Kerrington Lewis.

Subpoenas issued in connection with a federal grand jury in Pittsburgh seek interviews, police reports, medical records, witness statements and physical evidence collected as part of the initial criminal case against Miles and a city Office of Municipal Investigations review of the Jan. 12 arrest.

The Department of Justice is investigating as well, spokesman Alejandro Miyar said.


The Second Crime: Delay in a matter of Justice


When the event happened, the bureaucracy protected itself. Initially the police chief, the public safety director, the mayoral spokeswomen, the mayor - none of them were inclined to call foul, all of them (for reasons large and small) were motivated to keep their heads down and hope this thing goes away.

So the City announces an investigation. Then they learn the Feds are on the scene. In an attempt to make lemonade, the City announces that their investigation will continue but they won't release any results until the Fed inquiry is over. They don't want to damage the process. Nice.

Why would they think that? How could this posibly go away? This is where it gets ugly, this is the second crime. The delay plays to the bureaucracy's advantage in a few ways:
  • If it came to a head early, it probably wouldn't go well for the bureaucracy. It's always good policy to kick bad news down the road.
  • In another year or two, who knows what might happen to this 18-year-old living in Homewood? Maybe he'd get busted for dope and need something from the powerful. Maybe he'd get shot in a drive-by. Look at the numbers.
I'm not claiming there was a strategy session where an old hand set the course and everybody lined up behind it. I'm saying that for each factotum, the incentives were to wait and play the long game, and that economy of incentives rippled through the ranks of power like an invisible hand, and the uncoordinated result was a very efficient delay. (This is also the MO in the G-20 litigation.)


Run the clock. The House always wins. It's a classic example of how a structure of people (99% of whom are not racist, nobody's in the Klan), an organization, can act in a racist way when none of their members are overt racists. It's institutional racism.

On June 13,
Nearly 100 people marched Saturday afternoon from the Lower Hill District to Downtown to demand that three city police officers be charged for allegedly beating a Homewood teen in January.

Officers XXXXX, XXXXX, XXXXX are on paid leave while the city and a federal grand jury investigate a claim by Jordan Miles, 18, that he was assaulted during an arrest.

Police spokeswoman Diane Richard offered no timetable yesterday on when the investigations might be completed.


On August 13, activists demanded arrests of the three police officers.
The officers remain on paid leave pending a civil rights investigation by the FBI.

"This is not an indictment of all police officers," said community activist Paradise Gray. "But the only time we hear about good police officers is when other officers do bad things."

The delay in deciding whether to file charges stems from the district attorney's policy not to conduct simultaneous investigations, said spokesman Mike Manko.

"We're waiting on the findings of the federal investigation," Manko said. "We appreciate your concern, but that's where this stands."

Zappala's policy irked Miles' supporters. "He has the power. He's created a policy that he can change, and he chooses not to," said Harvey Holtz of Squirrel Hill, another activist.

The city's Office of Municipal Investigations is waiting for completion of the federal investigation before releasing its report. FBI spokesman Bill Crowley could not be reached for comment.


On August 30 2010, Jordan Miles filed a federal lawsuit against Pittsburgh, seeking punitive damages, an injunction limiting the officers' contact with the public, and a declaratory judgment that their actions were illegal and unconstitutional.

In a criminal investigation, the City and the beaucracy hold a hold of influence. They control the evidence room, which apparently lost all the evidence in the event. In a federal investigation, the City still has influence. But in a civil suit, the city is just another litigant.

All of a sudden Jordan Miles has a little bit of potential power, and the bureaucracy's last hope is that over the course of time, something negative happens to Jordan Miles. That's a very dangerous situation when the City has a paramilitary force with guns, and the FOP has its own motivations for making this thing go away.

The second crime is bureaucracy cynically delaying the process.
The victim of the beating is possibly in an even more dangerous situation.

continuing - - -
January 21, 2011

The Crime of Pittsburgh's Jordan Miles


You read stories about young black men who end up hurt or killed after interacting with police. Let me make an assumption that I can't prove, but seems true on its face: A lot of those young men were doing something they weren't supposed to do, a lot of them were criminals, a lot of them have prior records.

In the aftermath of the injury/death, the newspaper stories often describe the young man as an angel. He shoveled the snow at his Aunt's house. He helped a friend move. He was a good kid that didn't mean any harm. He planned to get his GED next year. He was a choir boy. Let me make another assumption I can't prove: most of the time, that dead young man wasn't really a choir boy. Most of the time.

Sometimes a mistake is made. Everybody make mistakes. There's not too many.

Sometimes it's no mistake. Sometimes Rogue cops, out-of-control bad cops, beat up a kid who is, in fact, an honor student and a choir boy. The cops get to write the reports, they have control of the scene, they produce the record of what happened. What does the kid have?

One year ago this week, Jordan Miles, a senior at the city's Creative and Performing Arts high school, was beaten by three cops. They beat him, tazed him, left him with a tree branch impaling his gums, and then filed charges of aggravated assault and resisting arrest against him.

In reality, his only crime was WWB: Walking While Black.

Let me also say: ninety-nine percent of police officers are excellent people who care. That's why they're cops. God bless them.



continuing - - -