Showing posts with label justice4jordan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label justice4jordan. Show all posts
February 04, 2012

I'll take "Curiouser and Curiouser" for 75K, please



According to the Post-Gazette, legislation will be introduced at City Council on Tuesday authorizing payment of $75,000 to Jordan Miles in a partial settlement of his federal lawsuit about Pittsburgh police brutality.

The partial settlement would dismiss the city and its officials from the suit, but leave intact the litigation against the three officers Mr. Miles accuses of beating him on a Homewood street in January 2010.

The city had previously offered $180K as a complete settlement, which Mr. Jordan rejected. That offer was generally understood as a legal technique to deny Mr. Jordan's legal fees if any final award comes in at less than $180K; it was, in fact, a technique challenging his legal representation.

This legislation before Council could be very interesting. Nobody wants to have their name attached to the settlement offer, nobody will admit to wrong-doing; it's a "jeopardy calculation". A few points:
  • The settlement will remove Mayor Luke Ravenstahl from accountability
  • There's no indication the settlement is acceptable to Jordan Miles

The City is willing to pay $75K to change the narrative to say: Stuff happens. It's not Luke Ravenstahl's fault; it's not the City's fault; it's not a systemic fault. Maybe those three individual policemen did something wrong, but not the City, not the Police Department, not their Training, and definitely not the City's policy regarding "99 cars" a/k/a "jump cars". It's not like there's any recent history.

It would be fascinating if Council disapproves the settlement because they'd like to see the City have a moment of truth in Court - the whole "justice be done" thing.

Personally, I hope Jordan Miles' legal team gives the City a beating just like the City gave to Jordan Miles, because until that happens the politicians accountable for the police department will continue to view the FOP as a voting block and nothing will change.

JusticeForJordanMiles
justice4jordan
January 12, 2012

Losing Faith: 1960's Alabama and Relative Perniciousness

Relativity is tricky, in both physics and ethics. Sometimes it's pretty clear that two things are both "bad", but it's hard to say which is worse, to quantify or evaluate relative perniciousness.

In a recent incident, an Allegheny County police officer says he stopped at a congested intersection. There were two Township policemen and a Township Councilman. The County Cop says that when he asked them about the intersection, one Township cop punched the County cop in the throat and knocked him down, then the two Township cops filed affadavits and charged the County cop with criminal charges. The charges were without merit and were dismissed. The County cop is now suing.

Here's a question: Which was worse:
  1. the Township cop assaulting the County cop, or
  2. the two Township cops filing false statements, charging a crime that didn't exist, and attempting to put the County cop in jail?
The assault is a one-time violent wrong, which if survived will diminish over time; the perjury, conspiracy, and false imprisonment will have life-long effects if successful.

Here's an observation: the perjury, conspiracy, and false imprisonment of the County Cop didn't succeed, but the "justice system" did not follow through; there was no accountability for the two Township cops - who, if the County cop is right, committed crimes of their own. The criminal justice system did not deal with the false reports and fake charges; the victim had to resort to a civil lawsuit to try to right the wrong. And this is a policeman.




I believe in our system and our society. More to the point, I want to believe in our system and our society. (Because in the end, it's all about me.) And so I think, ok that's just one event. Aberrations happen. It's the exception that shows how good things are, most of the time. I want to believe that. All my inclinations make me want to believe.

Increasingly, I'm having trouble believing that there's just one problem every few years.




For instance, from the Post-Gazette's Sadie Gurman, Nov 13 2010:
The Allegheny County district attorney's office said it will review dozens of criminal cases involving a pair of Pittsburgh police officers charged Friday with framing two men in what prosecutors called a wrongful drug arrest.

Officers Kenneth Simon, 49, and Anthony Scarpine, 58, were put on paid leave and could face termination in light of the charges against them, which include conspiracy, official oppression, unsworn falsification and obstruction. Officer Simon also was charged with felony perjury and is accused of stealing more than $800 from the pockets of one of the men he and Officer Scarpine arrested.

The charges were the result of a months-long probe by the district attorney's office into the July 7 arrests of Tim Joyce, 22, and David Carpenter, 38, at a North Side car wash. Numerous drug offenses against the men were filed -- and later withdrawn -- after the officers wrote in sworn accounts that they witnessed a hand-to-hand cocaine transaction that the district attorney's office said did not take place.

Surveillance footage from the car wash, in the 2900 block of Stayton Street, "does not depict any contact whatsoever" between either suspect and shows Officer Simon taking a wad of what appeared to be cash from Mr. Joyce's pocket
, prosecutors wrote in a criminal complaint.
Charges against the police officers were dismissed.




Sure, maybe there's more than one bad cop out there; it's not all of them, just some. And I'd like to think that the rest of the criminal justice system protects us from those few bad apples. Because the really bad stuff, that all happened in Alabama in the 1960's. Not in these modern times, not in Pennsylvania. Couldn't happen here/now.




From Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, we have this:
The "Kids for cash" scandal unfolded in 2008 over judicial kickbacks at the Luzerne County Court of Common Pleas in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania. Two judges, President Judge Mark Ciavarella and Senior Judge Michael Conahan, were accused of accepting money from Robert Mericle builder of two private, for-profit juvenile facilities, in return for contracting with the facilities and imposing harsh sentences on juveniles brought before their courts in order to ensure that the detention centers would be utilized.

Two interesting sidebars to mention:
  • Is this what happens when you privatize government functions (such as prison) - maybe when you run government like a business, justice goes away and you get business-like results?
  • None of this is trivial when one of the possible outcomes of our criminal justice system is execution.

How did these Luzerne County kids end up? How did the false imprisonment change them, their view of society, their view of justice? As a parent, what do you do when the Cops, the Judge, and the Prosecutor falsely imprison your child, and your kid gets raped in jail, joins a gang, and comes out a different person? Does anybody believe that expunging their criminal record makes them whole?




Which brings me, inexorably, to Jordan Miles. Jordan Miles (the violin-playing honor student at the magnet school) was beaten, tased, and had the hair ripped out of his scalp by three Pittsburgh policemen. The policemen submitted affadavits and charged Jordan Miles with crimes.

Fortunately, Jordan Miles had family and a clean record. If he'd had a marijuanna bust a few years prior and if English wasn't the primary language in his house, it all would have gone differently. But his family supported him, his community supported him, and the charges were dropped.

The more I think about it, the beating and scalping weren't the worst things those cops did to Jordan Miles; the attempt to falsely imprison him looms much larger. And if he didn't have a clean record and family support, it would have happened.

The more pernicious crime may be the filing of false statements, the conspiracy of the official report, and the attempt to deprive Jordan Miles of his liberty, to label an innocent man a criminal, and to (in fact) make him into a different person by sending him to prison for a few years.





I want to believe in our system, I really do. But when I look at the conspiracy to falsely imprison Jordan Miles; when I look at the fabrication of a story about Tim Joyce and David Carpenter, and again with Officer Ray Hrabos; when I look at the police escorting Big Ben in Georgia; and when I look at Luzerne County, I think: don't be naive, don't be a sucker.

And in each of these cases, the criminal justice system didn't self-correct; Ray Hrabos and Jordan Miles are seeking justice in civil court.

And when these incidents are left unchallenged, when the wrongs are not made right, our entire system is degraded and the people lose faith. And so the damage done by these perjuries, conspiracies, and false imprisonment accrues to both the instant victim and to our society at large. This hurts everybody.



And finally, I need to say: this is not most police, who are good, caring people. I would go further and acknowledge that most of those good police are prisoners of the system too. I understand why Alexis Madrigal expresses empathy for John Pike of UC-Davis. Peter Moskos attributes a lot of this to flawed training and places the blame on police departments, not police officers. James Baldwin recognized that notorious Alabama Sheriff Jim Clark was merely the endpoint of a system that shaped the sheriff just as it shaped the people the sheriff attacked.

The understanding that most police are not the problem does not mitigate the issue; as Allegheny County police officer Ray Hrabos said about his experience, "Wrong is wrong, and this needs to be righted".

Every complaint needs to offer a recommendation or else it's just whining; the recommendation is, We need to treat false reports and false charges (not wrong charges) as pernicious crimes against both the individual and society.


JusticeForJordanMiles
justice4jordan
January 09, 2012

Second Anniversary of Jordan Miles' Beating by Pittsburgh Police



Two years ago this week, at 11pm on Jan 11 2010, there was an event involving three Pittsburgh policemen and one young man.

The three police officers were in a "99 car", which is a special sort of squad. Between them, these three officers accounted for 20% of Pittsburgh's illegal firearms arrests (no data available on convictions) in the previous year.

More recently, on Christmas Eve it was also an unmarked "99 Car" with plainclothes police that shot and killed a 24-year old black man who was trying to get away from them.

There is no independent truth from two years ago, no video tape or disinterested eyewitnesses, but it seems like everybody's version involves these common elements:
  • The plain-clothes cops saw Jordan Miles and got out of their unmarked car.
  • Jordan Miles ran away.
  • They chased him, tased him, and beat him.
  • They stuck a tree branch through his cheek, and ripped the hair out of a portion of his head.
While Jordan Miles was in the hospital (pictures here), the police submitted paperwork describing Jordan's behavior and charged him with crimes: loitering and prowling after dark, resisting arrest, escape, and aggravated assault (of the three policemen). The judge dismissed all the charges against Jordan.

The three cops spent a year off duty, drawing full pay and benefits, and even drawing the overtime money etc. they would have earned if they hadn't taken a year off with pay.

Local government decided not to investigate the event because the Feds were going to look at it. The Feds decided there was insufficient evidence to make a conviction of the police officers likely.

The City Of Pittsburgh has paid a retired cop to report that (acccording to the policemen's official version of events) the police acted consistently with their training. The consultant did not say that the official version was true, or that what the policemen did was either legal, moral, or justifiable. Pittsburgh Courier contributor Louis 'Hop' Kendrick writes that Pittsburgh paid Jesse James to investigate Frank James.

The police say that Jordan Miles had a Mountain Dew they thought was a gun. There is no Mountain Dew can/bottle in the evidence. The city's consultant explains that absence as an excusable, understandable failure to secure evidence.

A year ago, on the first anniversary of the beating, the Post-Gazette said,
A year after what looks like the unnecessarily harsh treatment of a law-abiding citizen, there is no sign of movement toward a just conclusion.

Pittsburghers have a right to know what happened to Jordan Miles. He and the officers have a right to see the facts aired in public. Until that day, a cloud will hang over Pittsburgh and what passes for justice, accountability and transparency in this city.




Until this is resoved, the Beating of Jordan Miles will continue to reflect poorly on the city of Pittsburgh and on the great majority of the police force who had nothing to do with it.
December 26, 2011

Correct Expectations, Kick the Can, Accountability re Jordan Miles



Sometimes, evaluating an experience depends on your expectations. If your expectations are informed and realistic, you are more likely to end up with the appropriate degree of satisfaction.

Before you go downtown — for dinner, a play, a meeting, business, etc — make sure you have the correct expectations.

From the excellent Rick Lord in today's Post Gazette::
The City of Pittsburgh paid a consultant, Joseph J Stine, to write a report which "concludes that jumping out of an unmarked car, pursuing Mr. Miles and striking him until he submitted to being handcuffed were consistent with police training."
If that's not your expectation when you go into the city, perhaps you should recalibrate. Also, a minor nit: testifying for cash that something is "consistent with training" is not the same as saying it's legal, justified, or moral. The Police Academy lesson plan doesn't trump the Constitution.

Playing Kick the Can


The report is not a whitewash; it does find one instance of incorrect procedure. When the policemen threw away the Mountain Dew can that they thought was a gun, they violated evidence rules. The report explains that this error is understandable in the context.

Jordan Miles insists there was no Mountain Dew. The report asserts without evidence that there was one.

The Mountain Dew is the purported basis for the police beating. No Dew, no justification.
If there ain't no Can,
Why did you Beat the Man?

If there ain't no Dew,
WTF is wrong with You?





Hired guns deliver the desired outputs. According to AELE, Mr. Stine's rates are:
  • $275 per hour for review of material and report preparation and submission
  • $100 per hour for travel
  • $2,000.00 per day depositon [sic]
  • $2,500.00 per day for trial testimony days
  • $1,200.00 per day for monitoring testimony
  • All plus expenses


Traditionally, a litigant gives a consultant money to get the desired report which is biased in favor of their case. What's curious in this instance is that the litigant (the City of Pittsburgh and the Mayor of Pittsburgh) are public and elected, respectively, and so they are presumably accountable for their decisions and the way they spend the Public Treasure.
  • It would be interesting to hear the Mayor support (or disavow) the expert report He paid for.
  • It would be interesting to hear who decided to hire this consultant, and what process guides public spending on this sort of thing.
  • It would be interesting to know, what public official supports the expense and the report that the City has introduced to the Court as authoritative and reliable?




The intriguing question is whether the City, the Pittsburgh Police, and the CopOnTheBeat actually believe this report (which they have told the Court is truthful). I kind of hope that they don't believe it, either.

@justice4jordan