Wisconsin General Strike Posters

In Wisconsin a General Strike has been called for by two labor organizations, the South Central Federation of Labor and the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW, or Wobblies).



From SCFL.org:

The South Central Federation of Labor is an umbrella organization for 97 labor unions representing 45,000 workers in Dane, Dodge, Sauk, Columbia, Jefferson and Iowa counties in the state of Wisconsin.

Just as workers join together to form unions because there is strength in numbers and collective action, unions join together in Central Labor Councils, like SCFL, for the same reasons. There are 600 Central Labor Councils throughout the United States. In essence, the purpose of any Central Labor Council is solidarity between unions in a given geographic area.

From Business Insider:

The South Central Federation of Labor, an umbrella organization representing more than 45,000 workers in Wisconsin, voted last night to endorse a Wisconsin general strike if the state legislature passes Gov. Scott Walker's budget, the Wisconsin State Journal reports.

Delegates of the 97-union federation voted unanimously in favor of the strike, and called for the group to start educating members on the "organization and function of a Wisconsin general strike."

From Labor Union Report, a story about the IWW:

... the [Industrial Workers of the World] Wobblies have been around since 1905 and, although the IWW has declined significantly since its 100,000-member peak in 1923, it has been getting some recent notice trying to unionize Starbucks and Jimmie John’s.

The IWW has historically supported the concept of the general strike — all workers uniting to shut down commerce. In 1919, the IWW and other Leftists were successful in a general strike in Seattle. Since then, while there have been industry-wide strikes in the U.S., there have not been general strikes in the United States.

[Wisconsin Governor] Walker still won’t budge from his position. It will take something bigger from the unions and the working-class as a whole: a general strike, which will show Walker that millions are willing to fight his agenda.

The Wobblies are an interesting group with their own vernacular (see, for instance, Jerusalem Slim). Locally, they go back to the 1909 McKees Rocks strike. (In fact, this 1909 Pittsburgh newspaper clipping describes the plant owner in terms that could be used for today's Governor Walker.) From Wikipedia:

The IWW was founded in Chicago in 1905 at a convention of socialists, anarchists, and radical trade unionists from all over the United States who disagreed with the policies of the American Federation of Labor (AFL).

In particular, the IWW was organized because of the belief that the AFL was structured by narrow craft principles which divided groups of workers, while the Wobblies believed that all workers should organize as a class

.

The IWW motto was "an injury to one is an injury to all", which broadened the 19th century Knights of Labor's creed, "an injury to one is the concern of all." When founded, IWW was the only American union (besides the Knights of Labor) to welcome all workers including women, immigrants, and African Americans into the same organization.

The IWW has produced a Wisconsin general strike pamphlet and these posters:

This might become more interesting.

Finished, Shop Class as Soulcraft

Finished reading Shop Class as Soulcraft: An Inquiry into the Value of Work, by Matthew B. Crawford. Crawford is a Ph.D. (political philosophy) who left academia to make his living as a motorcycle mechanic. This book is an expansion of an essay originally published in the journal The New Atlantis, and the essay is a fine introduction to Crawford's thoughts.


Crawford talks about the psychic appeal of manual labor, and points out that it is in dealing with the physical world that we interact with reality, and that those who do manual labor usually have to improvise based on the situation at hand - a decision-making process that improves with experience, requires thoughtfulness, and presents an objective measure of success - things often lacking in contemporary work.


He talks about the crafts and the teaching of a craft to young people, providing an arena for failure, learning, and the development of pragmatism. He talks about the degradation of blue-collar work, then of the degradation of white-collar work, and explains that by removing judgement and discretion from the worker (wearing any color collar), Corporations are moving the thinking part of the job into the corporate process, and dumbing down, demeaning, and removing opportunities for excellence and mastery from the employee's realm. The book is a cultural rebuke to the field of knowledge management. Crawford suggests that the blue-collar, hands-on jobs considered "low" by today's culture may actually provide for more intellectual work that office jobs do.

Crawford encourages young people to go to college for an education, and to learn a craft for a livelihood. He points out that plumbers, electricians, and mechanics haven't faced outsourcing and overseas competition because the physical nature of their work and the fact that the worker must adapt to the specific situation at hand makes these fields incompatible with "knowledge management" and "process improvement" - he makes the point that when you want a deck on your house, you hire a local, not somebody in China.

He recognizes the complexity of modern life and sets a simple virtuous standard for interacting with the modern world - he calls for achieving "a mastery over your own stuff", being able to fix and maintain your own property and devices.


In my own experience, I take a small pleasure in repairing flat tires on my bicycle and then patching and re-using the tubes, not because it saves a bit of money and reduces waste, but because it permits me to interact with the thing-in-itself, it lets me work on my own "stuff", and it is clearly done either well or poorly.

I really enjoyed the way Crawford describes the increasingly lost concept of the journeyman, and teases out the tension between judgment and decision making on one hand and on slavish attention to rules and procedures on the other hand. He points out that although Rules may permit untrained inexperienced people to handle basic-to-normal situations, Judgment will develop journeymen who can adapt and resolve difficult-to-complex situations. This was a particularly pleasing part of the book, because the spectrum between judgment and rules is of great interest to me (I fall with Crawford in favor of Judgement).

Philosophically, he suggests a chosen life focused on the physical rather than the virtual or administrative, a work focused on livelihood rather than self-esteem, the development of judgement rather than rule-following, and a participation in the local rather than the global economy.

I found the book very similar to Robert Pirsig's Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance: An Inquiry into Values, but curiously the somewhat negative NYTimes book review specifically says that this is not Pirsig Part Two. Having read the book, I disagree with the NYTimes reviewer; I did not find that the book has "a chip on its shoulder", but rather found that it suggested an alternative approach to the admin 2.0 workplace, in a manner that continued Pirsig's line of thought.

This was an excellent book and I recommend it.